4.8 Article

Anomalously warm temperatures are associated with increased injury deaths

期刊

NATURE MEDICINE
卷 26, 期 1, 页码 65-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-019-0721-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust ISSF Studentship
  2. Wellcome Trust [209376/Z/17/Z]
  3. US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), as part of the Center for Clean Air Climate Solution [R835873]
  4. MRC [MR/S019669/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Temperatures that deviate from the long-term local norm affect human health, and are projected to become more frequent as the global climate changes(1). There are limited data on how such anomalies affect deaths from injuries. In the present study, we used data on mortality and temperature over 38 years (1980-2017) in the contiguous USA and formulated a Bayesian spatio-temporal model to quantify how anomalous temperatures, defined as deviations of monthly temperature from the local average monthly temperature over the entire analysis period, affect deaths from unintentional (transport, falls and drownings) and intentional (assault and suicide) injuries, by age group and sex. We found that a 1.5 degrees C anomalously warm year, as envisioned under the Paris Climate Agreement(2), would be associated with an estimated 1,601 (95% credible interval 1,430-1,776) additional injury deaths. Of these additional deaths, 84% would occur in males, mostly in adolescence to middle age. These would comprise increases in deaths from drownings, transport, assault and suicide, offset partly by a decline in deaths from falls in older ages. The findings demonstrate the need for targeted interventions against injuries during periods of anomalously warm temperatures, especially as these episodes are likely to increase with global climate change. Bayesian spatio-temporal modeling of mortality from injuries in the contiguous USA shows increases in the number of deaths attributable to abnormal temperature fluctuations due to global heating.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据