4.8 Article

Broad immune activation underlies shared set point signatures for vaccine responsiveness in healthy individuals and disease activity in patients with lupus

期刊

NATURE MEDICINE
卷 26, 期 4, 页码 618-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-020-0769-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
  2. NIH Institutes supporting the Center for Human Immunology
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [ZIAAI001152, ZIAAI000825, ZICAI001226, ZIAAI001241] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Simultaneous single-cell protein and transcriptome analysis identifies a baseline immune circuit associated with antibody responses to vaccination in healthy individuals and the severity of disease flares in patients with a subtype of systemic lupus erythematosus. Responses to vaccination and to diseases vary widely across individuals, which may be partly due to baseline immune variations. Identifying such baseline predictors of immune responses and their biological basis is of broad interest, given their potential importance for cancer immunotherapy, disease outcomes, vaccination and infection responses. Here we uncover baseline blood transcriptional signatures predictive of antibody responses to both influenza and yellow fever vaccinations in healthy subjects. These same signatures evaluated at clinical quiescence are correlated with disease activity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus with plasmablast-associated flares. CITE-seq profiling of 82 surface proteins and transcriptomes of 53,201 single cells from healthy high and low influenza vaccination responders revealed that our signatures reflect the extent of activation in a plasmacytoid dendritic cell-type I IFN-T/B lymphocyte network. Our findings raise the prospect that modulating such immune baseline states may improve vaccine responsiveness and mitigate undesirable autoimmune disease activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据