4.8 Article

Atomic-level tuning of Co-N-C catalyst for high-performance electrochemical H2O2 production

期刊

NATURE MATERIALS
卷 19, 期 4, 页码 436-+

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41563-019-0571-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. Research Center Program of the IBS in Korea [IBS-R006-D1]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government [2018M1A2A2061998]
  3. University of Seoul
  4. Research Center Program of the IBS [IBS-R006-A2]
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2018M1A2A2061982, IBS-R006-D1-2020-A00] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite the growing demand for hydrogen peroxide it is almost exclusively manufactured by the energy-intensive anthraquinone process. Alternatively, H2O2 can be produced electrochemically via the two-electron oxygen reduction reaction, although the performance of the state-of-the-art electrocatalysts is insufficient to meet the demands for industrialization. Interestingly, guided by first-principles calculations, we found that the catalytic properties of the Co-N-4 moiety can be tailored by fine-tuning its surrounding atomic configuration to resemble the structure-dependent catalytic properties of metalloenzymes. Using this principle, we designed and synthesized a single-atom electrocatalyst that comprises an optimized Co-N-4 moiety incorporated in nitrogen-doped graphene for H2O2 production and exhibits a kinetic current density of 2.8 mA cm(-2) (at 0.65 V versus the reversible hydrogen electrode) and a mass activity of 155 A g(-1) (at 0.65 V versus the reversible hydrogen electrode) with negligible activity loss over 110 hours. Producing H2O2 electrochemically currently use electrocatalysts that are insufficient to meet the demands for industrialization. A single-atom electrocatalyst with an optimized Co-N4 moiety incorporated in nitrogen-doped graphene is shown to exhibit enhanced performance for H2O2 production.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据