4.8 Article

Global patterns of terrestrial nitrogen and phosphorus limitation

期刊

NATURE GEOSCIENCE
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 221-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41561-019-0530-4

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41877328, 41630750, 31400381]
  2. Fok Ying-Tong Education Foundation [161015]
  3. Project of State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface and Resource Ecology of Beijing Normal University [2017-ZY-07]
  4. Lawrence Fellow award through the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL)
  5. US Department of Energy [DE-AC52-07NA27344]
  6. LLNL-LDRD Program [20-ERD-055]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spatial patterns in the phosphorus and nitrogen limitation in natural terrestrial ecosystems are reported from analysis of a global database of the resorption efficiency of nutrients by leaves. Nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) limitation constrains the magnitude of terrestrial carbon uptake in response to elevated carbon dioxide and climate change. However, global maps of nutrient limitation are still lacking. Here we examined global N and P limitation using the ratio of site-averaged leaf N and P resorption efficiencies of the dominant species across 171 sites. We evaluated our predictions using a global database of N- and P-limitation experiments based on nutrient additions at 106 and 53 sites, respectively. Globally, we found a shift from relative P to N limitation for both higher latitudes and precipitation seasonality and lower mean annual temperature, temperature seasonality, mean annual precipitation and soil clay fraction. Excluding cropland, urban and glacial areas, we estimate that 18% of the natural terrestrial land area is significantly limited by N, whereas 43% is relatively P limited. The remaining 39% of the natural terrestrial land area could be co-limited by N and P or weakly limited by either nutrient alone. This work provides both a new framework for testing nutrient limitation and a benchmark of N and P limitation for models to constrain predictions of the terrestrial carbon sink.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据