4.8 Article

Redox lipid reprogramming commands susceptibility of macrophages and microglia to ferroptotic death

期刊

NATURE CHEMICAL BIOLOGY
卷 16, 期 3, 页码 278-+

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41589-019-0462-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [HL114453-06, U19AI068021, CA165065-06, NS076511, NS061817, P41GM103712]
  2. Russian academic excellence project '5-100'

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Susceptibility to ferroptosis can be modulated by nitric oxide (NO center dot) and NO synthase iNOS and through enrichment of activated M1 macrophages. NO inhibits the lipoxygenase 15-LOX that drives production of pro-ferroptotic lipids in macrophages. Ferroptotic death is the penalty for losing control over three processes-iron metabolism, lipid peroxidation and thiol regulation-that are common in the pro-inflammatory environment where professional phagocytes fulfill their functions and yet survive. We hypothesized that redox reprogramming of 15-lipoxygenase (15-LOX) during the generation of pro-ferroptotic signal 15-hydroperoxy-eicosa-tetra-enoyl-phosphatidylethanolamine (15-HpETE-PE) modulates ferroptotic endurance. Here, we have discovered that inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS)/NO center dot-enrichment of activated M1 (but not alternatively activated M2) macrophages/microglia modulates susceptibility to ferroptosis. Genetic or pharmacologic depletion/inactivation of iNOS confers sensitivity on M1 cells, whereas NO center dot donors empower resistance of M2 cells to ferroptosis. In vivo, M1 phagocytes, in comparison to M2 phagocytes, exert higher resistance to pharmacologically induced ferroptosis. This resistance is diminished in iNOS-deficient cells in the pro-inflammatory conditions of brain trauma or the tumour microenvironment. The nitroxygenation of eicosatetraenoyl (ETE)-PE intermediates and oxidatively truncated species by NO center dot donors and/or suppression of NO center dot production by iNOS inhibitors represent a novel redox mechanism of regulation of ferroptosis in pro-inflammatory conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据