4.8 Article

An electroencephalographic signature predicts antidepressant response in major depression

期刊

NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 38, 期 4, 页码 439-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41587-019-0397-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [U01MH092221, U01MH092250]
  2. Stanford Neurosciences Institute
  3. Hersh Foundation
  4. NIH [DP1 MH116506]
  5. National Key Research and Development Plan of China [2017YFB1002505]
  6. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61876063, 61836003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The efficacy of an antidepressant is predicted from an EEG signature. Antidepressants are widely prescribed, but their efficacy relative to placebo is modest, in part because the clinical diagnosis of major depression encompasses biologically heterogeneous conditions. Here, we sought to identify a neurobiological signature of response to antidepressant treatment as compared to placebo. We designed a latent-space machine-learning algorithm tailored for resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) and applied it to data from the largest imaging-coupled, placebo-controlled antidepressant study (n = 309). Symptom improvement was robustly predicted in a manner both specific for the antidepressant sertraline (versus placebo) and generalizable across different study sites and EEG equipment. This sertraline-predictive EEG signature generalized to two depression samples, wherein it reflected general antidepressant medication responsivity and related differentially to a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment outcome. Furthermore, we found that the sertraline resting-state EEG signature indexed prefrontal neural responsivity, as measured by concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation and EEG. Our findings advance the neurobiological understanding of antidepressant treatment through an EEG-tailored computational model and provide a clinical avenue for personalized treatment of depression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据