4.8 Article

On-device lead sequestration for perovskite solar cells

期刊

NATURE
卷 578, 期 7796, 页码 555-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2001-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DMR 1806152]
  2. US Department of Energy [DE-AC36-08GO28308]
  3. Alliance for Sustainable Energy, Limited Liability Company (LLC), the Manager and Operator of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory
  4. US Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Solar Energy Technologies Office

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Perovskite solar cells, as an emerging high-efficiency and low-cost photovoltaic technology(1-6), face obstacles on their way towards commercialization. Substantial improvements have been made to device stability(7-10), but potential issues with lead toxicity and leaching from devices remain relatively unexplored(11-16). The potential for lead leakage could be perceived as an environmental and public health risk when using perovskite solar cells in building-integrated photovoltaics(17-23). Here we present a chemical approach for on-device sequestration of more than 96 per cent of lead leakage caused by severe device damage. A coating of lead-absorbing material is applied to the front and back sides of the device stack. On the glass side of the front transparent conducting electrode, we use a transparent lead-absorbing molecular film containing phosphonic acid groups that bind strongly to lead. On the back (metal) electrode side, we place a polymer film blended with lead-chelating agents between the metal electrode and a standard photovoltaic packing film. The lead-absorbing films on both sides swell to absorb the lead, rather than dissolve, when subjected to water soaking, thus retaining structural integrity for easy collection of lead after damage. Using lead-absorbing materials to coat the front and back of perovskite solar cells can prevent lead leaching from damaged devices, without affecting the device performance or long-term operation stability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据