4.8 Article

Alfvenic velocity spikes and rotational flows in the near-Sun solar wind

期刊

NATURE
卷 576, 期 7786, 页码 228-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1813-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. PSP mission under NASA [NNN06AA01C]
  2. 2019 Summer School at the Center for Computational Astrophysics, Flatiron Institute
  3. Simons Foundation
  4. Leverhulme Trust Visiting Professorship programme
  5. UK STFC [ST/S0003641/1]
  6. STFC [ST/S000364/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The prediction of a supersonic solar wind(1) was first confirmed by spacecraft near Earth(2,3) and later by spacecraft at heliocentric distances as small as 62 solar radii(4). These missions showed that plasma accelerates as it emerges from the corona, aided by unidentified processes that transport energy outwards from the Sun before depositing it in the wind. Alfvenic fluctuations are a promising candidate for such a process because they are seen in the corona and solar wind and contain considerable energy(5-7). Magnetic tension forces the corona to co-rotate with the Sun, but any residual rotation far from the Sun reported until now has been much smaller than the amplitude of waves and deflections from interacting wind streams(8). Here we report observations of solar-wind plasma at heliocentric distances of about 35 solar radii(9-11), well within the distance at which stream interactions become important. We find that Alfven waves organize into structured velocity spikes with duration of up to minutes, which are associated with propagating S-like bends in the magnetic-field lines. We detect an increasing rotational component to the flow velocity of the solar wind around the Sun, peaking at 35 to 50 kilometres per second-considerably above the amplitude of the waves. These flows exceed classical velocity predictions of a few kilometres per second, challenging models of circulation in the corona and calling into question our understanding of how stars lose angular momentum and spin down as they age(12-14).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据