4.8 Article

In vitro characterization of the human segmentation clock

期刊

NATURE
卷 580, 期 7801, 页码 113-+

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1885-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Health [5R01HD085121, 1K99GM121852]
  2. NSF GRFP
  3. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [F31HD100033] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The segmental organization of the vertebral column is established early in embryogenesis, when pairs of somites are rhythmically produced by the presomitic mesoderm (PSM). The tempo of somite formation is controlled by a molecular oscillator known as the segmentation clock(1,2). Although this oscillator has been well-characterized in model organisms(1,2), whether a similar oscillator exists in humans remains unknown. Genetic analyses of patients with severe spine segmentation defects have implicated several human orthologues of cyclic genes that are associated with the mouse segmentation clock, suggesting that this oscillator might be conserved in humans(3). Here we show that human PSM cells derived in vitro-as well as those of the mouse(4)-recapitulate the oscillations of the segmentation clock. Human PSM cells oscillate with a period two times longer than that of mouse cells (5 h versus 2.5 h), but are similarly regulated by FGF, WNT, Notch and YAP signalling(5). Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals that mouse and human PSM cells in vitro follow a developmental trajectory similar to that of mouse PSM in vivo. Furthermore, we demonstrate that FGF signalling controls the phase and period of oscillations, expanding the role of this pathway beyond its classical interpretation in 'clock and wavefront' models(1). Our work identifying the human segmentation clock represents an important milestone in understanding human developmental biology. Human presomitic mesoderm cells derived in vitro demonstrate oscillations of the segmentation clock, thus providing a window into an otherwise inaccessible stage of human development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据