4.6 Article

Porous Sb with three-dimensional Sb nanodendrites as electrode material for high-performance Li/Na-ion batteries

期刊

NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 31, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6528/ab6751

关键词

porous Sb; Sb nanodendrites; lithium/sodium-ion batteries

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51301117, 51671140]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province of China [201801D121281]
  3. International Cooperation Project Foundation of Shanxi Province China [201603D421037, 2015081053]
  4. Top Young Academic Leaders of Shanxi
  5. Higher School Science and Technology Innovation Project Foundation of Shanxi Province China [2016128]
  6. 1331 project' Key Innovation Teams of Shanxi Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The increasing demand in energy consumption and the use of clean energy from sustainable energy sources have driven the research in the development of advanced materials for Li-ion and Na-ion batteries. In this work, we have developed a simple technique to synthesize a porous Sb structure through a galvanic replacement reaction between Sb3+ and Zn particles. The porous Sb structure consists of a three-dimensional-hierarchical structure with tree-like nanoscale Sb dendrites. The Sb in the nanodendrites is crystal of a rhombohedral structure. We construct Li-/Na-ion half cells and Li-/Na-ion full cells with the Sb nanodendrites as the active material in the working electrode and anode, respectively, and introduce an additive of vinylene carbonate for the Li-ion half/full cells and an additive of fluoroethylene carbonate for the Na-ion half/full cells. All the Li-/Na-ion half cells and Li-/Na-ion full cells exhibit excellent electrochemical performance and cycling stability. Such excellent performance can be attributed to the synergistic interaction between the three-dimensional-dendritic structure and electrolyte, which likely ensures fast transport of ions and electrons and the formation of a stable solid-state interphase.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据