4.6 Article

Enhanced mechanical properties of 4H-SiC by epitaxial carbon films obtained from bilayer graphene

期刊

NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 31, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6528/ab6d9e

关键词

graphene; nanoindentation; diamondene; mechanical properties; thermal stability

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51562027, 11772145, 51862026]
  2. Advantage Technology Innovation Team of Jiangxi Province [20181BCB24007]
  3. Technology Project of the Department of Education of Jiangxi Province [GJJ170586]
  4. Science and Technology of the University of PLA project [KYZXJK123]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Graphene exhibits excellent mechanical properties under atomically thin thickness, which made it very suitable for nanoelectromechanical systems that had high requirements for the thickness of coatings. The epitaxial bilayer graphene on the 4H-SiC (0001) surface presents high stiffness and hardness comparable to diamond. However, due to structural transition occurring at the nanoscale, it is difficult to elucidate reinforcement mechanisms using experimental methods. Here, we applied molecular dynamics simulations to study nanoindentation of epitaxial carbon-film-covered 4H-SiC (0001) surfaces. Because a weak interaction potential existed between graphene layers at indentation depth (h < 0.8 angstrom) that far smaller than interlayer distance, the epitaxial bilayer graphene does not allow the 4H-SiC to exceed its intrinsic stiffness. When the indentation depth h >= 6.45 angstrom, the sp(3) hybridized bonds formed on the interlayer of graphene, which leads to fewer amorphous atoms in the sample of 4H-SiC and exhibits stronger stiffness, in comparison with bare 4H-SiC. This strongly suggests the existence of sp(3) bonds contributing to the surface strengthening. Meanwhile, we found that the comprehensive mechanical properties of nanocomposites with hydrogenated diamond-like films were superior to those of nanocomposites with other carbon films at high temperatures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据