4.6 Article

Synthesis of microflower-like vacancy defective copper sulfide/reduced graphene oxide composites for highly efficient lithiumion batteries

期刊

NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 31, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6528/ab57f6

关键词

lithium ion battery; CuS/rGO composite; S vacancy; spray drying

资金

  1. Program for the Outstanding Young Talents of Hebei Province, China
  2. Chunhui Project of Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China [Z2017010]
  3. Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan [BR05236524]
  4. Nazarbayev University [110119FD4504]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Copper sulfide (CuS) is considered a promising anode material for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) due to its high theoretical capacity and good electrical conductivity. However, the inferior cycle performance and low coulombic efficiency of CuS caused by structure detoriation and degradation and the `shuttling effect' of polysulfide intermediates are restricting its practical application. In this work, we report a facile method to generate S vacancies (Vs) in CuS nanoflowers by thermal annealing in Ar. The obtained CuS was composited with reduced graphene oxide (rGO) to prepare an anode for LIBs. The existence of vacancy defects in CuS leads to electron delocalization and excitation, which is responsible for the conductivity improvement and fast charge transport kinetics. Meanwhile, the graphene coating layer ensures fast pathways for Li+ ion diffusion and provides strong physical adsorption of the polysulfides. Furthermore, hierarchical CuS spheres composed of ultrathin nanosheets provide large void spaces to accommodate the volume expansion of CuS. The synthesized composite exhibited a high initial discharge capacity of 882 mAh g(-1) and demonstrated stable cyclability along with around 99% coulombic efficiency over 100 cycles. The results of this work reveal that Vs-CuS/rGO composites are promising anodes to enhance the performance of next-generation lithium-ion batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据