4.7 Article

Precision angular diameters for 16 southern stars with VLTI/PIONIER

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa282

关键词

standards; techniques: interferometric; stars: fundamental parameters

资金

  1. Australian Government Research Training Program
  2. Research School of Astronomy AMP
  3. Astrophysics top up scholarship
  4. Australian Research Council [FT160100402, DP170102233]
  5. European Southern Observatory (ESO) program [099.D2031(A), 0101.D-0529(A), 0102.D-0562(A)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the current era of Gaia and large, high signal-to-noise stellar spectroscopic surveys, there is an unmet need for a reliable library of fundamentally calibrated stellar effective temperatures based on accurate stellar diameters. Here, we present a set of precision diameters and temperatures for a sample of 6 dwarf, 5 sub-giant, and 5 giant stars observed with the PIONIER beam combiner at the VLTI. Science targets were observed in at least two sequences with five unique calibration stars each for accurate visibility calibration and to reduce the impact of bad calibrators. We use the standard PIONIER data reduction pipeline, but bootstrap over interferograms, in addition to employing a Monte Carlo approach to account for correlated errors by sampling stellar parameters, limb darkening coefficients, and fluxes, as well as predicted calibrator angular diameters. The resulting diameters were then combined with bolometric fluxes derived from broad-band Hipparcos-Tycho photometry and MARCS model bolometric corrections, plus parallaxes from Gaia to produce effective temperatures, physical radii, and luminosities for each star observed. Our stars have mean angular diameter and temperatures uncertainties of 0.8 per cent and 0.9 per cent, respectively, with our sample including diameters for 10 stars with no pre-existing interferometric measurements. The remaining stars are consistent with previous measurements, with the exception of a single star which we observe here with PIONIER at both higher resolution and greater sensitivity than was achieved in earlier work.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据