4.7 Article

Rapid grain growth in post-AGB disc systems from far-infrared and sub-millimetre photometry

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa425

关键词

stars: AGB and post-AGB; circumstellar matter; dust, extinction

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan [MOST104-2628-M-001-004MY3, MOST107-2119-M-001-031-MY3]
  2. Academia Sinica [AS-IA-106-M03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The time-scales on which astronomical dust grows remain poorly understood, with important consequences for our understanding of processes like circumstellar disc evolution and planet formation. A number of post-asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars are found to host optically thick, dust- and gas-rich circumstellar discs in Keplerian orbits. These discs exhibit evidence of dust evolution, similar to protoplanetary discs; however, since post-AGB discs have substantially shorter lifetimes than protoplanetary discs, they may provide new insights on the grain-growth process. We examine a sample of post-AGB stars with discs to determine the far-infrared and sub-millimetre spectral index by homogeneously fitting a sample of data from Herschel, the Submillimeter Array (SMA), and the literature. We find that grain growth to at least hundreds of micrometres is ubiquitous in these systems, and that the distribution of spectral indices is more similar to that of protoplanetary discs than debris discs. No correlation is found with the mid-infrared colours of the discs, implying that grain growth occurs independently of the disc structure in post-AGB discs. We infer that grain growth to -millimetre sizes must occur on time-scales < <10(5) yr, perhaps by orders of magnitude, as the lifetimes of these discs are expected to be less than or similar to 10(5) yr and all objects have converged to the same state. This growth time-scale is short compared to the results of models for protoplanetary discs including fragmentation and may provide new constraints on the physics of grain growth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据