4.7 Article

Rotation and spots in normal A and Am/Fm stars

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz3623

关键词

stars: chemically peculiar; stars: general; stars: rotation; starspots

资金

  1. International Science Program (ISP) of Uppsala University
  2. Belgo-Indian Network for Astronomy & Astrophysics (BINA) [DST/INT/Belg/P-02]
  3. Belgian Federal Science PolicyOffice (BELSPO, Govt. of Belgium) [BL/33/IN12]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Frequency analysis of long-term ultraprecise photometry can lead to precise values of rotation frequencies of rotating stars with 'hump and spike' features in their periodograms. Using these features, we computed the rotation frequencies and amplitudes. The corresponding equatorial rotational velocity (V-rot) and spot size were estimated. On fitting the autocorrelation functions of the light curves with the appropriate model, we determined the star-spot decay time-scale. The V-rot agrees well with the projected rotational velocity (nu sin i) in the literature. Considering a single circular and black spot, we estimate its radius from the amplitude of the 'spike'. No evidence for a significant difference in the average 'spike' amplitude and spot radius was found for Am/Fm and normal A stars. Indeed, we derived an average value of similar to 21 +/- 2 and similar to 19 +/- 2 ppm for the photometric amplitude and of 1.01 +/- 0.13 and 1.16 +/- 0.12 R-E for the spot radius (where R-E is the Earth radius), respectively. We do find a significant difference for the average spot decay time-scale, which amounts to 3.6 +/- 0.2 and 1.5 +/- 0.2 d for Am/Fm and normal A stars, respectively. In general, spots on normal A stars are similar in size to those on Am/Fm stars, and both are weaker than previously estimated. The existence of the 'spikes' in the frequency spectra may not be strongly dependent on the appearance of star-spots on the stellar surface. In comparison with G, K, and M stars, spots in normal A and Am/Fm stars are weak, which may indicate the presence of a weak magnetic field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据