4.7 Article

Are inner disc misalignments common? ALMA reveals an isotropic outer disc inclination distribution for young dipper stars

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz3361

关键词

planet-star interactions; protoplanetary discs; binaries: visual; stars: variables: T Tauri, Herbig Ae/Be

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [AST-1518332]
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) [NNX15AC89G, NNH18ZDA001N/EW]
  3. NASA [NNX15AD95G/NEXSS, NAS5-26555]
  4. UK Science and Technology Research Council (STFC)
  5. NASA through the Exoplanets Research programme [15XRP15 20140]
  6. Royal Society
  7. NASA Science Mission directorate
  8. W. M. Keck Foundation
  9. STFC [ST/S000623/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dippers are a common class of young variable star exhibiting day-long dimmings with depths of up to several tens of per cent. A standard explanation is that dippers host nearly edge-on (i(d) approximate to 70 degrees) protoplanetary discs that allow close-in (<1 au) dust lifted slightly out of the mid-plane to partially occult the star. The identification of a face-on dipper disc and growing evidence of inner disc misalignments brings this scenario into question. Thus, we uniformly (re)derive the inclinations of 24 dipper discs resolved with (sub-)mm interferometry from ALMA. We find that dipper disc inclinations are consistent with an isotropic distribution over i(d) approximate to 0-75 degrees, above which the occurrence rate declines (likely an observational selection effect due to optically thick disc mid-planes blocking their host stars). These findings indicate that the dipper phenomenon is unrelated to the outer (>10 au) disc resolved by ALMA and that inner disc misalignments may be common during the protoplanetary phase. More than one mechanism may contribute to the dipper phenomenon, including accretion-driven warps and 'broken' discs caused by inclined (sub-)stellar or planetary companions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据