4.6 Article

Adsorption and Desorption Performance and Mechanism of Tetracycline Hydrochloride by Activated Carbon-Based Adsorbents Derived from Sugar Cane Bagasse Activated with ZnCl2

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 24, 期 24, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules24244534

关键词

adsorption; desorption; mechanism; sugar cane bagasse; activated carbons; tetracycline

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51773159, 51303142]
  2. Outstanding Young and Middle-aged Scientific Innovation Team of Colleges and Universities of Hubei Province: Biomass chemical technologies and materials [T201908]
  3. Science and Technology Planning Program of Guangdong [2015A010105018]
  4. Special fund of Guangdong Academy of Science [2018GDASCX-0105]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adsorption and desorption behaviors of tetracycline hydrochloride by activated carbon-based adsorbents derived from sugar cane bagasse modified with ZnCl2 were investigated. The activated carbon was tested by SEM, EDX, BET, XRD, FTIR, and XPS. This activated carbon exhibited a high BET surface area of 831 m(2) g(-1) with the average pore diameter and pore volume reaching 2.52 nm and 0.45 m(3) g(-1), respectively. The batch experimental results can be described by Freundlich equation, pseudo-second-order kinetics, and the intraparticle diffusion model, while the maximum adsorption capacity reached 239.6 mg g(-1) under 318 K. The effects of flow rate, bed height, initial concentration, and temperature were studied in fixed bed adsorption experiments, and adsorption data were fitted with six dynamic adsorption models. The results of characterizations and the batch experiments were analyzed to study the adsorption and desorption mechanisms. Tetracycline hydrochloride and activated carbon were bonded together by pi-pi interactions and cation-pi bonds. Ethanol was used as an eluent which bonded with 10 hydrogen bond acceptors on tetracycline hydrochloride to form a complex by hydrogen bonding to achieve recycling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据