4.7 Article

Gene Therapy for Glaucoma by Ciliary Body Aquaporin 1 Disruption Using CRISPR-Cas9

期刊

MOLECULAR THERAPY
卷 28, 期 3, 页码 820-829

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2019.12.012

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Eye Research Centre [BRI 019]
  2. T.F.C. Frost Charitable Trust
  3. Above & Beyond, Bristol
  4. Fight for Sight [1730/1731]
  5. Elizabeth Blackwell Institute for Health Research
  6. University of Bristol
  7. Medical Research Council
  8. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre based at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology
  9. Retina UK
  10. NIHR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glaucoma is a common cause of blindness, yet current therapeutic options are imperfect. Clinical trials have invariably shown that reduction in intraocular pressure (IOP) regardless of disease subtype prevents visual loss. Reducing ciliary body aqueous humor production can lower IOP, and the adeno-associated virus ShH10 serotype was identified as able to transduce mouse ciliary body epithelium following intravitreal injection. Using ShH10 to deliver a single vector CRISPR-Cas9 system disrupting Aquaporin 1 resulted in reduced IOP in treated eyes ( 10.4 +/- 2.4 mmHg) compared with control (13.2 +/- 2.0 mmHg) or non-injected eyes (13.1 +/- 2.8mmHg; p < 0.001; n = 12). Editing in the aquaporin 1 gene could be detected in ciliary body, and no off-target increases in corneal or retinal thickness were identified. In experimental mouse models of corticosteroid and microbead-induced ocular hypertension, IOP could be reduced to prevent ganglion cell loss (32 +/- 4 /mm(2)) compared with untreated eyes (25 +/- 5/mm(2); p < 0.01). ShH10 could transduce human ciliary body from post-mortem donor eyes in ex vivo culture with indel formation detectable in the Aquaporin 1 locus. Clinical translation of this approach to patients with glaucoma may permit long-term reduction of IOP following a single injection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据