4.7 Article

circCAMSAP1 Promotes Tumor Growth in Colorectal Cancer via the miR-328-5p/E2F1 Axis

期刊

MOLECULAR THERAPY
卷 28, 期 3, 页码 914-928

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2019.12.008

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFC1308800]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81870383]
  3. Clinical Innovation Research Program of Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory [2018GZR0201005]
  4. Guangdong Natural Science Foundation [2017A030313785]
  5. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangzhou City [201804010014]
  6. Science and Technology Planning Project [2015B020229001, 20160916]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increasing studies indicated that circular RNAs (circRNAs) play important roles in cancer progression. However, the roles of circRNAs in colorectal cancer (CRC) remain largely unknown. In this study, we determined the circRNA expression profile by next-generation RNA sequencing from eight CRC and paired non-cancerous matched tissues. circCAMSAP1 (originating from exon 2 to exon 3 of the CAMSAP1 gene, hsa_ circ_0001900) was significantly upregulated in CRC tissues. Increased circCAMSAP1 expression was significantly correlated with advanced tumor/node/metastasis (TNM) stage and shortened overall survival. An elevation of circCAMSAP1 expression was detected via droplet digital PCR in the serum of CRC patients prior to surgery. Functionally, circCAMSAP1 promoted the malignant behavior of CRC. Mechanism study of upstream biogenesis of circCAMSAP1 indicated that circCAMSAP1 cyclization inCRC wasmediated by splicing factor epithelial-splicing regulatory protein 1. Moreover, circCAMSAP1 acted as a sponge for miR-328-5p and abrogated its suppression on transcription factor E2F1. Taken together, our data indicated an essential role of the circCAMSAP1/miR-328-5p/E2F1 axis in the progression of CRC, which implied that circCAMSAP1 could serve as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker as well as a potential therapeutic target for CRC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据