4.5 Article

Broad Specificity of Amino Acid Chemoreceptor CtaA of Pseudomonas fluorescens Is Afforded by Plasticity of Its Amphipathic Ligand-Binding Pocket

期刊

MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS
卷 33, 期 4, 页码 612-623

出版社

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/MPMI-10-19-0277-R

关键词

chemotaxis; crystal structure; methyl-accepting protein; sensing domain

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [DP180101807]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Motile bacteria follow gradients of nutrients or other environmental cues. Many bacterial chemoreceptors that sense exogenous amino acids contain a double Cache (dCache; calcium channels and chemotaxis receptors) ligand-binding domain (LBD). A growing number of studies suggest that broad-specificity dCache-type receptors that sense more than one amino acid are common. Here, we present an investigation into the mechanism by which the dCache LBD of the chemo-receptor CtaA from a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium, Pseudomonas fluorescens, recognizes several chemically distinct amino acids. We established that amino acids that signal by directly binding to the CtaA LBD include ones with aliphatic (L-alanine, L-proline, L-leucine, L-isoleucine, L-valine), small polar (L-serine), and large charged (L-arginine) side chains. We determined the structure of CtaA LBD in complex with different amino acids, revealing that its ability to recognize a range of structurally and chemically distinct amino acids is afforded by its easily accessible plastic pocket, which can expand or contract according to the size of the ligand side chain. The amphipathic character of the pocket enables promiscuous interactions with both polar and nonpolar amino acids. The results not only clarify the means by which various amino acids are recognized by CtaA but also reveal that a conserved mobile lid over the ligand-binding pocket adopts the same conformation in all complexes, consistent with this being an important and invariant part of the signaling mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据