4.7 Article

A LysM Receptor Heteromer Mediates Perception of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbiotic Signal in Rice

期刊

MOLECULAR PLANT
卷 12, 期 12, 页码 1561-1576

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.molp.2019.10.015

关键词

rice; arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis; Myc factors; Nod factors; LysM receptor-like kinases

资金

  1. NSFC [31730103, 31825003, 31522007]
  2. National Key Basic Research Programme in China [2015CB158300]
  3. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB27040207]
  4. International Partnership Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [153D31KYSB20160074]
  5. National Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Genetics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Symbiotic microorganisms improve nutrient uptake by plants. To initiate mutualistic symbiosis with arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi, plants perceive Myc factors, including lipochitooligosaccharides (LCOs) and short-chain chitooligosaccharides (CO4/CO5), secreted by AM fungi. However, the molecular mechanism of Myc factor perception remains elusive. In this study, we identified a heteromer of LysM receptor-like kinases consisting of OsMYR1/OsLYK2 and OsCERK1 that mediates the perception of AM fungi in rice. CO4 directly binds to OsMYR1, promoting the dimerization and phosphorylation of this receptor complex. Compared with control plants, Osmyr1 and Oscerk1 mutant rice plants are less sensitive to Myc factors and show decreased AM colonization. We engineered transgenic rice by expressing chimeric receptors that respectively replaced the ectodomains of OsMYR1 and OsCERK1 with those from the homologous Nod factor receptors MtNFP and MtLYK3 of Medicago truncatula. Transgenic plants displayed increased calcium oscillations in response to Nod factors compared with control rice. Our study provides significant mechanistic insights into AM symbiotic signal perception in rice. Expression of chimeric Nod/Myc receptors achieves a potentially important step toward generating cereals that host nitrogen-fixing bacteria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据