4.7 Article

Plant- and Fish-Derived n-3 PUFAs Suppress Citrobacter Rodentium-Induced Colonic Inflammation

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.201900873

关键词

colon; inflammation; lipid mediators; PUFAs

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [MOP-89894, IOP-92890]
  2. CIHR Foundation [353857]
  3. Atlantic Innovation Fund [201211]
  4. Restracomp Postdoctoral Research Fellowship Award
  5. Canada Research Chair in Gastrointestinal Disease
  6. New Brunswick Innovation Research Chair in Biosciences
  7. Sir Henry Dale Fellowship - Wellcome Trust [107613/Z/15/Z]
  8. Sir Henry Dale Fellowship - Royal Society [107613/Z/15/Z]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Scope Marine-derived n-3 PUFAs may ameliorate inflammation associated with inflammatory bowel diseases. Plant-derived n-3 PUFAs are thought to be inferior owing to shorter chain lengths. The aim of this study is to compare the impact of plant- and fish-derived PUFAs on murine colitis. Methods and results C57BL/6 mice are fed high fat (36% kcal) diets with either 2.5% w/w sunflower oil (SO), flaxseed oil (FSO), ahiflower oil (AO), or fish oil (FO). After 4 weeks, mice are orogastrically challenged with Citrobacter rodentium (10(8) CFU) or sham gavaged. Fecal shedding is assayed at 2, 7, 10, and 14 days post infection (PI), and fecal microbiota at 14 days PI. Colonic inflammation and lipid mediators are measured. Supplementation regulates intestinal inflammation with crypt lengths being 66, 73, and 62 +/- 17 mu m shorter (compared to SO) for FSO, AO, and FO respectively, p < 0.01. FSO blunts pathogen shedding at the peak of infection and FSO and AO both enhance fecal microbial diversity. FO attenuates levels of lipoxin and leukotriene B-4 while plant oils increase pro-resolving mediator concentrations including D, E, and T-series resolvins. Conclusion Plant and fish n-3 PUFAs attenuate colitis-induced inflammation while exhibiting characteristic pro-resolving lipid mediator metabolomes. Plant oils additionally promote microbial diversity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据