4.5 Article

Identification of the main glutamine and glutamate transporters in Staphylococcus aureus and their impact on c-di-AMP production

期刊

MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY
卷 113, 期 6, 页码 1085-1100

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mmi.14479

关键词

AlsT; amino acid transport; c-di-AMP; GltS; glutamate transporter; glutamine transporter; OpuD; osmolyte transport; Staphylococcus aureus

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [P01AI083211, R01AI125588]
  2. Medical Research Council
  3. Wellcome Trust [100289/Z/12/Z, 210671/Z/18/Z]
  4. Wellcome Trust [100289/Z/12/Z, 210671/Z/18/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A Staphylococcus aureus strain deleted for the c-di-AMP cyclase gene dacA is unable to survive in rich medium unless it acquires compensatory mutations. Previously identified mutations were in opuD, encoding the main glycine-betaine transporter, and alsT, encoding a predicted amino acid transporter. Here, we show that inactivation of OpuD restores the cell size of a dacA mutant to near wild-type (WT) size, while inactivation of AlsT does not. AlsT was identified as an efficient glutamine transporter, indicating that preventing glutamine uptake in rich medium rescues the growth of the S. aureus dacA mutant. In addition, GltS was identified as a glutamate transporter. By performing growth curves with WT, alsT and gltS mutant strains in defined medium supplemented with ammonium, glutamine or glutamate, we revealed that ammonium and glutamine, but not glutamate promote the growth of S. aureus. This suggests that besides ammonium also glutamine can serve as a nitrogen source under these conditions. Ammonium and uptake of glutamine via AlsT and hence likely a higher intracellular glutamine concentration inhibited c-di-AMP production, while glutamate uptake had no effect. These findings provide, besides the previously reported link between potassium and osmolyte uptake, a connection between nitrogen metabolism and c-di-AMP signalling in S. aureus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据