4.5 Article

Rapamycin treatment maintains developmental potential of oocytes in mice and follicle reserve in human cortical fragments grafted into immune-deficient mice

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2019.110694

关键词

Rapamycin; MTOR; Ovarian reserve; Primordial follicle; Oocyte developmental potential

资金

  1. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development [19H03801, 18K09275, 18K19624]
  2. Mochida Memorial Foundation for Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
  3. Takeda Science Foundation
  4. Naito Foundation
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18K09275, 19H03801, 18K19624] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ovarian follicle pool size is limited; it decreases with age and following germ cell-damaging chemo- or radiation therapies. Due to a trend of delaying child-bearing age in the modern society, it is important to investigate the possibility to maintain the follicle reserve for middle-aged women and cancer-bearing patients subject to therapies. Earlier studies demonstrated the important role of the mammalian targets of the rapamycin (MTOR) signaling pathway in the activation of primordial follicles and suggested that treatment with the MTOR inhibitor rapamycin could maintain the follicle pool in rodents. Here, we confirmed the ability of rapamycin treatment for 3 weeks to suppress primordial follicle development and to maintain follicle pool size in mice. We further demonstrated that the developmental potential of oocytes was not affected by rapamycin treatment and the effect of rapamycin to decrease initial follicle recruitment is reversible. Using human ovarian cortical fragments grafted into immune-deficient mice, we demonstrated the ability of rapamycin to suppress follicle growth from the primordial stage. Our studies provide the basis for further studies on the possibility of using MTOR inhibitors to maintain follicle reserve in middle-aged women and cancer patients before/during germ cell-damaging therapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据