4.7 Article

MaXLinker: Proteome-wide Cross-link Identifications with High Specificity and Sensitivity

期刊

MOLECULAR & CELLULAR PROTEOMICS
卷 19, 期 3, 页码 554-568

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1074/mcp.TIR119.001847

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Protein-protein interactions play a vital role in nearly all cellular functions. Hence, understanding their interaction patterns and three-dimensional structural conformations can provide crucial insights about various biological processes and underlying molecular mechanisms for many disease phenotypes. Cross-linking mass spectrometry (XL-MS) has the unique capability to detect protein-protein interactions at a large scale along with spatial constraints between interaction partners. The inception of MS-cleavable cross-linkers enabled the MS2-MS3 XL-MS acquisition strategy that provides cross-link information from both MS2 and MS3 level. However, the current cross-link search algorithm available for MS2-MS3 strategy follows a MS2-centric approach and suffers from a high rate of misidentified cross-links. We demonstrate the problem using two new quality assessment metrics [fraction of mis-identifications (FMI) and fraction of interprotein cross-links from known interactions (FKI)]. We then address this problem, by designing a novel MS3-centric approach for cross-link identification and implementing it as a search engine named MaXLinker. MaXLinker outperforms the currently popular search engine with a lower mis-identification rate, and higher sensitivity and specificity. Moreover, we performed human proteome-wide cross-linking mass spectrometry using K562 cells. Employing MaXLinker, we identified a comprehensive set of 9319 unique cross-links at 1% false discovery rate, comprising 8051 intraprotein and 1268 interprotein cross-links. Finally, we experimentally validated the quality of a large number of novel interactions identified in our study, providing a conclusive evidence for MaXLinker's robust performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据