4.4 Review

Hyperoxia and oxidative stress in anesthesia and critical care medicine

期刊

MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA
卷 86, 期 1, 页码 64-75

出版社

EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA
DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.19.13906-5

关键词

Hyperoxia; Oxidative stress; Anesthesia; Critical care; Oxygen consumption

资金

  1. Department of Health Science, University of Milan
  2. CARIPLO Foundation [2010-1496]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oxygen administration is particularly relevant in patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia and in those who suffer from acute or critical illness. Nevertheless, excess O-2, or hyperoxia, is also known to be harmful. Toxicity arises from the enhanced formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that, exceeding the antioxidant defense, may generate oxidative stress. Oxidative stress markers are used to quantify ROS toxicity in clinical and non-clinical settings and represent a promising tool to assess the optimal FiO(2) in anesthesia and critical care setting. Despite controversial, the guidelines for the regulation of FiO(2) in such settings suggest the adoption of high perioperative oxygen levels. However, hyperoxia has also been shown to be an independent mortality risk factor in critically ill patients. In this literature review, we discuss the biochemical mechanisms behind oxidative stress and the available biomarkers for assessing the prooxidant vs antioxidant status. Then, we summarize recent knowledge on the hyperoxia-related consequences in the most common anesthesia and critical care settings, such as traumatic brain injury or cardiac arrest. To this purpose, we searched the PubMed database according to the following combination of key words: (hyperoxia OR FiO(2) OR oxygen therapy) AND (oxidative stress OR ROS OR RNS OR lipid peroxidation) AND (anesthesia OR surgery OR intensive care). We focused in the results from the past 20 years. Available evidence points toward a conservative monitoring and use of oxygen, unless there is solid proof of its efficacy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据