4.7 Article

Synthesis and modification of moisture-stable coordination pillared-layer metal-organic framework (CPL-MOF) CPL-2 for ethylene/ethane separation

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2019.109784

关键词

Ethylene; Ethane; Adsorption; Coordination pillared-layer metal-organic framework (CPL-MOF); Selectivity; Moisture stability

资金

  1. University of Manchester
  2. China Scholarship Council [201606150068]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adsorptive separation of ethylene/ethane (C2H4/C2H6) binary mixture has growing interest in petrochemical industries compared to the conventional energy-intensive cryogenic distillation. Development of moisture-stable materials with high selectivity is of great importance to accomplish C2H4/C2H6 separation. Coordination pillared-layer metal-organic framework (CPL-MOF) CPL-2 was synthesised at room temperature, and then modified by silver ions impregnation to enhance the selectivity towards ethylene over ethane. The synthesised CPL-2 and Ag/CPL-2 MOFs have excellent moisture stability which was confirmed by the dynamic water vapour adsorption analysis under 90% relative humidity, showing no significant framework decomposition, even at 50 degrees C. The calculated selectivity based on gravimetric single-component gas adsorption experiments shows the significantly improved C2H4/C2H6 selectivity from 1.4 to 26.1 after loading 10 wt.% (theoretical) of silver ions on CPL-2. Breakthrough experiments for C2H4/C2H6 (1:1, v/v) mixture suggest that both CPL-2 and 10 wt.% Ag/CPL-2 can achieve the binary mixture separation, and 10 wt.% Ag/CPL-2 shows relatively better dynamic separation performance compared to parent CPL-2. The good adsorption selectivity and moisture stability allow CPL-MOF to be a class of promising porous materials for further exploitation in the separation of C2H4/C2H6 mixtures. Additionally, the method presented here can potentially be extended to other CPLs with different pore sizes for alkene/alkane separations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据