4.7 Article

A poly(acrylic acid)-modified copper-organic framework for electrochemical determination of vancomycin

期刊

MICROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 187, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00604-019-4015-3

关键词

Cyclic voltammetry; Electrical impedance spectroscopy; Differential pulse voltammetry; Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Drug delivery; Redox active

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of South Africa (NRF-SA) [103728, 112079]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A copper(II) benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylate (BTC) metal-organic framework (MOF) was modified with poly(acrylic acid) (PAA) and then used in an electrochemical sensor for vancomycin. The MOF, synthesized via a single-pot method, has enhanced solubility and dispersibility in water as compared to HKUST-1 but without compromising its crystallinity and porosity. The MOF was placed on a glassy carbon electrode (GCE) where it shows enhanced electrocatalytic properties. This is assumed to be due to the presence of the poly(acrylic acid) that forms a network between various HKUST-1 crystals through dimer formation between the carboxy groups of BTC and PAA. This also led to better dispersion of the MOF and to improved interaction between MOF and vancomycin. The structural, spectral and electrochemical properties of the MOFs and their vancomycin complexes was characterized. The modified GCE is shown to be a viable tool for electrochemical determination (best at a working potential of 784 mV vs. Ag/AgCl) of the antibiotic vancomycin in spiked urine and serum samples. Response is linear in the 1-500 nM vancomycin concentration range, and the detection limit is 1 nM, with a relative standard deviation of 4.3%. Schematic representation of a method for determination of vancomycin. Poly(acrylic acid) modified HKUST-1 (P-HKUST-1) forms a complex with vancomycin [Van-P-HKUST-1] which is coated over glassy carbon electrode (GCE). The decrease in peak current is recorded as response to vancomycin via cyclic voltammetry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据