4.7 Article

The yeast peroxisome: A dynamic storage depot and subcellular factory for squalene overproduction

期刊

METABOLIC ENGINEERING
卷 57, 期 -, 页码 151-161

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymben.2019.11.001

关键词

Synthetic biology; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Peroxisome; Storage depot; Subcellular factory; Terpene

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31772007, 21776075]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central University of China [22221818014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Engineering microbes to produce terpenes from renewable feedstock is a promising alternative to traditional production approaches. Generally, terpenes are not readily secreted by microbial cells, and their distribution within cells is usually obscure and often a restricting factor for the overproduction of terpenes due to the storage limitation. Here, we determined that squalene overproduced in the cytoplasm of Saccharomyces cerevisiae was distributed in a form similar to oil droplets. Interestingly, these suspected oil droplets were confirmed to be inflated peroxisomes that were swollen along with the production of squalene, indicating that peroxisomes in S. cerevisiae are dynamic depots for the storage of squalene. In view of this, harnessing peroxisomes as subcellular compartments for squalene synthesis was performed, achieving a 138-fold improvement in squalene titer (1312.82 mg/L) relative to the parent strain, suggesting that the peroxisome of S. cerevisiae is an efficient subcellular factory for the synthesis of terpenes. By dual modulation of cytoplasmic and peroxisomal engineering, the squalene titer was further improved to 1698.02 mg/L. After optimizing a two-stage fed-batch fermentation method, the squalene titer reached 11.00 g/L, the highest ever reported. This provides new insight into the synthesis and storage of squalene in peroxisomes and reveals the potential of harnessing peroxisomes to overproduce terpenes in S. cerevisiae through dual cytoplasmic-peroxisomal engineering.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据