4.7 Article

Genome-scale evaluation of core one-carbon metabolism in gammaproteobacterial methanotrophs grown on methane and methanol

期刊

METABOLIC ENGINEERING
卷 57, 期 -, 页码 1-12

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymben.2019.10.004

关键词

Gammaproteobacterial methanotrophs; Serine cycle; Methane; Methanol; Genome-scale models; Flux sampling; C-13 tracer

资金

  1. C1 Gas Refinery Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science and ICT [2015M3D3A1A01064882]
  2. DOE (US) under FOA [DE-FOA-0001085]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Methylotuvimicrobium alcaliphilum 20Z is a promising platform strain for bioconversion of one-carbon (C1) substrates into value-added products. To carry out robust metabolic engineering with methylotrophic bacteria and to implement C1 conversion machinery in non-native hosts, systems-level evaluation and understanding of central C1 metabolism in methanotrophs under various conditions is pivotal but yet elusive. In this study, a genome-scale integrated approach was used to provide in-depth knowledge on the metabolic pathways of M. alcaliphilum 20Z grown on methane and methanol. Systems assessment of core carbon metabolism indicated the methanol assimilation pathway is mostly coupled with the efficient Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas (EMP) pathway along with the serine cycle. In addition, an incomplete TCA cycle operated in M. alcaliphilum 20Z on methanol, which might only supply precursors for de novo synthesis but not reducing powers. Instead, it appears that the direct formaldehyde oxidation pathway supply energy for the whole metabolic system. Additionally, a comparative transcriptomic analysis in multiple gammaproteobacterial methanotrophs also revealed the transcriptional responses of central metabolism on carbon substrate change. These findings provided a systems-level understanding of carbon metabolism and new opportunities for strain design to produce relevant products from different C1-feedstocks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据