4.5 Article

Experimental investigation and thermodynamic calculation of the Mg-Mn-Sr system

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.calphad.2015.12.005

关键词

Mg-Mn-Sr phase diagram; X-ray diffraction; Electron probe microanalysis; Thermodynamic calculations

资金

  1. project of Innovation-driven Plan in Central South University [2015CX004]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2014CB644002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Both experimental investigation and thermodynamic modeling were performed for the Mg-Mn-Sr system. Four decisive alloys were selected and prepared using a powder metallurgy method to measure the isothermal section at 500 degrees C via a combination of X-ray diffraction (XRD) and electron probe microanalysis (EPMA). No ternary compound has been observed for this ternary system. Four three-phase regions, (Mg)+(alpha Mn)+Mg17Sr2, Mg17Sr2+(alpha Mn)+Mg38Sr9, Mg38Sr9+(alpha Mn)+Mg23Sr6, and Mg23Sr6+(alpha Mn)+Mg2Sr, have been identified at 500 degrees C. No appreciable ternary solubility has been detected in the binary Mg-Sr compounds. Phase transition temperatures of the Mg-Mn-Sr alloys were measured by means of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurements. In the present modeling, the substitutional solution model was used to describe the liquid phase. Due to the high evaporability of Mg, Mn and Sr, the gas phase can affect higher temperature equilibria in the Mg-Mn-Sr system and thus was included and modeled as an ideal gas mixture. The thermodynamic calculations match well with the experimental data, indicating that no ternary thermodynamic parameters are needed for the thermodynamic description. In order to verify the reliability of the current thermodynamic modeling of the Mg-Mn-Sr system, five as-cast alloys in Mg-rich corner were prepared. The calculated liquidus projection is consistent with the observed primary phase regions. The present thermodynamic modeling is reliable and can be used in the development of the Mg alloys. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据