4.7 Review

Principles and current strategies targeting metallo-β-lactamase mediated antibacterial resistance

期刊

MEDICINAL RESEARCH REVIEWS
卷 40, 期 5, 页码 1558-1592

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/med.21665

关键词

anchor residue; antibiotic resistance; metal-binding pharmacophore; metalloenzyme; metallo-beta-lactamase

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81874291, 81502989]
  2. Scientific Research Foundation of Sichuan University [2082604401098, 20822041A4193]
  3. Sichuan Science and Technology Program [2018HH0100]
  4. Outstanding Interdiscipline Project of West China Hospital of Sichuan University [ZYJC18024]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Resistance to beta-lactam antibacterials is commonly associated with the production of the serine beta-lactamases (SBLs) and/or metallo-beta-lactamases (MBLs). Although clinically useful inhibitors for the SBLs have been developed, no equivalent inhibitors are available for the MBLs, which can hydrolyze almost all beta-lactam antibiotics, including the so-called last resort carbapenems. It is still a challenging task to develop a clinically useful inhibitor that should be broad-spectrum targeting multiple clinically relevant MBL enzymes that differ in their active site features. This review provides a detailed description of interaction modes of substrates and small-molecule inhibitors with various MBL enzymes and highlights the importance of metal- and anchor residue-binding features to achieve broad-spectrum MBL inhibition. Recently emerging active site interference strategies include metal ion deprivation, metal ion replacement, and cysteine modification as challenging, but worth experimenting directions for inhibitor development. The metalloenzyme selectivity, metal-binding pharmacophore, and cellular permeability and accumulation should be properly considered in the further development of clinically useful inhibitors to combat MBL-mediated antibacterial resistance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据