4.5 Article

An exemplar pyramid feature extraction based humerus fracture classification method

期刊

MEDICAL HYPOTHESES
卷 140, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2020.109663

关键词

Humerus fracture classification; Exemplar pyramid model; LBP; HOG; Orthopedic; Machine learning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Humerus fracture have been widely seen disease in the orthopedic clinics and classification of them is a hard process for orthopedist. The main aim of the proposed method is to classify humerus fracture by using a naive and multileveled method. We collected a novel humerus fracture X-ray image dataset. This dataset consists of 115 images. In this paper, a novel stable feature extraction method is presented to classify humerus fractures. This method is called exemplar pyramid method and it is inspired by exemplar facial expression recognition methods. To classify humerus fractures, X-ray images were employed as input. In this study, X-ray images are resized to 512 x 512 sized image. Then, the used humerus fracture images are divided into 64 x 64 size of exemplars. To create levels, maximum pooling which has been mostly used in deep networks is used and four levels are created. Histogram of oriented gradients (HOG) and local binary pattern (LBP) are employed for feature generation. The most discriminative ones of the generated and concatenated features are selected by using ReliefF and Neighborhood Component Analysis (NCA) based two levelled feature selector (RFNCA). To emphasize success of the proposed exemplar pyramid model based feature generation, four conventional classifiers are chosen for classification and the proposed exemplar pyramid model achieved 99.12% classification accuracy by using leave one out cross validation (LOOCV). Results and tests clearly illustrates success of the proposed exemplar pyramid model based humerus fracture classification method. The results also shown that the proposed exemplar pyramid model achieved higher classification rate than Orthopedist specialized in shoulder.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据