4.5 Review

Targeting NAD+ in translational research to relieve diseases and conditions of metabolic stress and ageing

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mad.2020.111208

关键词

NAD(+); Ageing; Clinical trials; Alzheimer's disease; Parkinson's disease

资金

  1. HELSE SOR-OST [2017056, 2019098]
  2. Research Council of Norway [262175, 277813]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81971327]
  4. Akershus University Hospital Strategic grant [269901]
  5. Rosa Sloyfe grant from the Norwegian Cancer Society [207819]
  6. Bergesenstiftelsen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD(+)) plays a fundamental role in life and health through the regulation of energy biogenesis, redox homeostasis, cell metabolism, and the arbitration of cell survival via linkages to apoptosis and autophagic pathways. The importance of HAD(+) in ageing and healthy longevity has been revealed from laboratory animal studies and early-stage clinical testing. While basic researchers and clinicians have investigated the molecular mechanisms and translation potential of HAD(+), there are still major gaps in applying laboratory science to design the most effective trials. This mini-review was based on the programme and discussions of the 3rd NO-Age Symposium held at the Akershus University Hospital, Norway on the 28th October 2019. This symposium brought together leading basic researchers on NAD(+) and clinicians who are leading or are going to perform NAD(+) augmentation-related clinical studies. This meeting covered talks about NAD(+) synthetic pathways, subcellular homeostasis of NAD(+), the benefits of NAD(+) augmentation from maternal milk to offspring, current clinical trials of the NAD(+) precursor nicotinamide riboside (NR) on Ataxia-Telangiectasia (A-T), Parkinson's disease (PD), post-sepsis fatigue, as well as other potential NR-based clinical trials. Importantly, a consensus is emerging with respect to the design of clinical trials in order to measure meaningful parameters and ensure safety.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据