4.7 Article

A new intelligent fault identification method based on transfer locality preserving projection for actual diagnosis scenario of rotating machinery

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106344

关键词

Transfer learning; Intelligent fault diagnosis; Locality preserving projection; Rotating machinery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intelligent fault diagnosis methods have been widely developed in recent years due to the ability in learning diagnosis knowledge from monitoring data automatically. However, for many diagnosis methods based on traditional machine learning algorithms, how to collect massive data under the same distribution with test data is a difficult problem in real world industrial applications. Aiming at this data dilemma of conventional intelligent diagnosis methods, this paper proposes a Transfer Locality Preserving Projection based Intelligent Fault Identification (TLPPIFI) method, which can construct diagnosis model using historical data collected from different operating conditions or other same-type machines. Based on a relevance assumption, TLPPIFI first embeds the data to a subspace through preserving a priori distribution structure properties of training data and minimizing the distribution discrepancy between different datasets simultaneously. By this means, the samples with same category in different datasets could cluster together in the new space. Finally, a classifier is trained to identify the condition of target machine by the historical data and the normal data of target machine together. The effectiveness of the proposed method is validated by three real-life diagnosis cases. The experimental results demonstrate that TLPPIFI can achieve superior diagnosis performance than several supervised learning methods and transfer learning methods. In addition, empirical analysis about distribution distance between domains and parameter sensitivity are also investigated. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据