4.6 Article

Series hybrid fuel cell/supercapacitor power source

期刊

MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN SIMULATION
卷 184, 期 -, 页码 21-40

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.matcom.2020.02.001

关键词

Series converter; Fuel cell; Supercapacitor; Power source

资金

  1. King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok, Thailand [KMUTNB-63-KNOW-035]
  2. Universite de Lorraine, France

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hybridization systems working with electric generators and energy storage devices are becoming more popular due to their advantages such as high efficiency, saved energy, and low pollution. This article proposes a novel converter structure for a hybrid fuel cell/supercapacitor application and provides operation and modeling as well as closed-loop controls.
Hybridization systems working with electric generators and energy storage devices lead to optimal technologies for recent power sources. They are becoming more popular due to their advantages such as high efficiency, saved energy and low pollution. There are many types of architecture of hybridization. This article proposes a novel converter structure for a hybrid fuel cell/supercapacitor application that the fuel cell is hybridized with a bank of supercapacitors. Its benefits include high efficiency and maximum use of supercapacitor energy. The mathematical model is developed. The operation and modeling of the converter are presented. Closed-loop controls by using an indirect-sliding mode technique for the inner current loop and the energy control in the outer loop including a disturbance estimator are provided. Finally, simulation and experimental results obtained from the 150 W testbench are given to validate the proposed converter and system. The obtained results have shown that the proposed converter structure offers the right candidate for a hybridization fuel cell/supercapacitor power source. (C) 2020 International Association for Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (IMACS). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据