4.3 Article

Passivation potential regulating corrosion resistance and antibacterial property of 316L-Cu stainless steel in different simulated body fluids

期刊

MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY
卷 36, 期 2, 页码 118-130

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10667857.2020.1734723

关键词

Cu-bearing stainless steel; passive film; corrosion resistance; antibacterial property

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB0300205]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51501199]
  3. State Key Program of National Natural Science of China [51631009]
  4. Foshan Science and Technology Program [2017AG100041]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the corrosion resistance of 316 L-Cu stainless steel improved with higher passivation potentials, due to increased Cr2O3 and Cu(OH)2 contents in the passive film. However, when the passivation potential reached 900 mV, the stability of the passive film decreased as Cr(OH)3 dissolved and transformed into CrO42-, leading to decreased antibacterial performance with higher compactness of the passive film.
In this work, the corrosion resistance of 316 L-Cu stainless steel (SS) after passivation at different potentials was studied by potentiodynamic polarization and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). The antibacterial property of passivated 316 L-Cu SS was also investigated by plate counting and live-dead cell staining combined with scanning electron microscope (SEM) observation. X-ray photoelectron spectroscope (XPS) was performed to analyse the composition of passive film. The results showed that the corrosion resistance increased with increase of the passivation potential from 600 mV to 750 mV, due to the enhancement of Cr2O3 and Cu(OH)(2) contents in passive film. When the passivation potential was increased to 900 mV, Cr(OH)(3) in passive film gradually dissolved and transformed to CrO42-, decreasing the stability of passive film. The higher compactness of passive film indicated a declined antibacterial performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据