4.7 Article

Comparison of AlSi7Mg0.6 alloy obtained by selective laser melting and investment casting processes: Microstructure and mechanical properties in as-built/as-cast and heat-treated conditions

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2020.139124

关键词

AlSi7Mg0.6 alloy; Selective laser melting; Investment casting; Heat treatment; Mechanical properties

资金

  1. Basque Government (Eusko Jaurlaritza) grant through the ADIFUN project [KK2017/00004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AlSi7Mg0.6 alloy is widely used in the automotive and aeronautical industries, and metal additive manufacturing (AM) is a breakthrough technology that motivates foundry companies to explore its potential in these industries; however, there is no deep knowledge of the mechanical properties and their relationship to microstructure in parts obtained by selective laser melting (SLM), as there is for parts obtained by casting. In this work, a comparison of the microstructure and mechanical properties of AlSi7Mg0.6 alloy obtained by SLM and investment casting processes was made. The mechanical properties of tensile specimens processed by both technologies were evaluated by uniaxial tensile tests and microhardness measurements in as-built/as-cast and heat-treated conditions with different build orientations in the case of SLM. An advanced characterization of the microstructure by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) and x-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was also performed. After analyzing the microstructure and mechanical properties obtained with different heat treatments, the strengthening mechanisms of the two processes were identified. It is possible to obtain improved mechanical properties with SLM processing, exceeding the typical values required for aeronautical parts obtained in investment casting heat-treated (T6), and the ductility is satisfactory. Direct aging after SLM processing can effectively strengthen the AlSi7Mg0.6 alloy and is the more effective way to improve the as-built mechanical properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据