4.7 Article

Mechanical properties and microstructural evolution of TA15 Ti alloy processed by selective laser melting before and after annealing

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2019.138742

关键词

Selective laser melting; TA15; Near-alpha Ti alloy; Microstructure; Mechanical property

资金

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2015AA042501]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Selective laser melting (SLM) is a promising additive manufacturing technique with growing acceptance in aerospace applications. In this work, a new aeronautical material of near-alpha Ti alloy (TA15) for SLM was firstly investigated and analyzed before and after annealing, mainly including mechanical properties, microstructural evolution. The distinctions between SLMed TA15 and wrought TA15 are also discussed in this study. Firstly, near full density TA15 samples (99.98%) were fabricated by SLM utilizing the optimized processing parameters. Then microstructures and textures are characterized and analyzed by optical microscope, X-ray diffractometer, scanning electron microscope and transmission electron microscope. Furthermore, mechanical properties of TA15 samples are measured via tensile and hardness test, considering the impacts of building direction. The results show that both the as-built and the annealed SLMed samples exhibit significantly weak textures and unconspicuous anisotropy of mechanical properties. It has been identified that alpha' martensite is dominant in the as-built microstructure thus contributing to similar to 1296 MPa in ultimate strength and similar to 398 HV in hardness which are 35% and 24% higher than those of wrought material. However, a low plasticity with similar to 7.6% of elongation at break was observed. After annealing, SLMed samples exhibited excellent comprehensive mechanical properties with 51% improvement at elongation through elimination of residual stress and precipitation of nanometer size beta phase in the fine basket-weave structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据