4.6 Article

Dimensionality and superconducting parameters of YBa2Cu3O7-d/(WO3NPs)x composites deduced from excess conductivity analysis

期刊

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
卷 243, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.122665

关键词

YBa2Cu3O7-d superconductor; Tungsten oxide nanoparticles; Excess conductivity; Critical magnetic fields; Critical current density

资金

  1. Institute for Research and Medical Consultations (IRMC) [2018-IRMC-S-2, 2017-IRMC-S-3]
  2. Deanship for Scientific Research (DSR) of Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (IAU-Saudi Arabia) [2018-209-IRMC]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Superconducting composite products of type YBa2Cu3O7-d (noted Y-123) added with different contents (x wt.%) of tungsten oxide nanoparticles (WO3 NPs), x = 0.0-1.0 wt%, were produced via the standard solid-state reaction technique. Samples were investigated by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscope (SEM) and electrical resistivity measurements. XRD examination showed that the Y-123 orthorhombic structure is not altered by WO3 NPs additions. SEM observations indicated a reduction in the grains size with the increase of nanoparticles content. The investigation of the excess conductivity of different prepared composites was analyzed using Aslamazov-Larkin (AL) model. The investigated samples comprised of five distinct fluctuation regimes, namely short-wave (SWF), one-dimensional (1D), two-dimensional (2D), three-dimensional (3D), and critical (CR) fluctuations regimes. The coherence length along c-axis at zero-temperature (xi(c)(0)), lower and upper critical magnetic fields (B-c1 and B-c2), critical current density (J(c)) and numerous other superconducting parameters were estimated with respect to WO3 NPs content. Compared to undoped Y-123 sample, it was found that an amount of x = 0.05 wt% of WO3 NPs is appropriate to improve the physical performances of Y-123, whereas with further increasing x, these performances were weakened.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据