4.4 Article

Chinese academic contribution to burns: A comprehensive bibliometrics analysis from 1985 to 2014

期刊

BURNS
卷 42, 期 7, 页码 1463-1470

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.02.002

关键词

Burns; China; PubMed; Bibliometrics analysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81120108015]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2012CB518100]
  3. Twelfth Five-Year Scientific Program of China [AWS11J008]
  4. 1255 Academic Discipline Project of Changhai Hospital [CH125510200]
  5. Priority for Clinical Key Discipline Project of Shanghai
  6. Outstanding Master Program of the Second Military Medical University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The objective of this study was to conduct a survey of the academic contribution and influence of Chinese scholars in the field of burns. Method: The PubMed database was searched to obtain literature items originating from various countries and Chinese provinces from 1985 to 2014. The citation data were collected through the Google Scholar engine. Results: A total of 1037 papers published in 256 journals were included in this survey. China was second only to the USA in the number of publications on burns since 2010. In addition, the annual number of papers has increased significantly since 2001. The journal Burns published the most number of articles, but its proportion has been decreasing. Of the papers included in the survey, 58.34% were published in journals with a 5-year impact factor between 1 and 2, whereas only 3.66% were published in journals with an impact factor >5. Both total citations and citations per paper have decreased in the past decade. Randomized controlled trials or systematic reviews merely accounted for a small proportion. Twenty-nine provinces including 64 cities contributed one paper at least. The publications from Taiwan, Beijing, Chongqing, Shanghai, and Guangdong were high in both quantity and quality. Conclusion: The Chinese academic contribution to the field of burns is now on a rise. Although the quality of papers is lagging behind quantity, scholars and academies are dedicated to improving China's academic level. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据