4.7 Review

Polysaccharide Based Hemostatic Strategy for Ultrarapid Hemostasis

期刊

MACROMOLECULAR BIOSCIENCE
卷 20, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/mabi.201900370

关键词

hemostasis; hemostatic strategy; performance; polysaccharides

资金

  1. Wenzhou Science and Technology Major Project [ZS2017023, ZY2019018]
  2. Wenzhou Science and Technology Public Project [G20180029]
  3. Wenzhou Institute, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences startup fund [WIUCASQD2019006]
  4. Zhejiang Province Welfare Technology Applied Research Project [LGF20C100002]
  5. Scientific Research Fund of National Health Commission [WKJ-ZJ-1707]
  6. Wenzhou Longwan District (High-tech Zone) Science and Technology Project [2018KG10Z]
  7. Project of State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Optometry and Visual Science, Wenzhou Medical University [K171204]
  8. State Key Project of Research and Development [2016YFC1100300]
  9. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31370969, 51673145]
  10. International Science & Technology Cooperation Program of China [2013DFG52040]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bleeding complications usually cause significant morbidity and mortality in civilian and military populations. In clinical application, hemostatic sponges, gauzes, hydrogel, and bandages are widely used as the traditional effective hemostatic products for hemorrhage. However, the traditional hemostatic devices or agents cannot meet the requirement for treatment of massive bleeding. Therefore, the excellent hemostatic performance of hemostatic products are of great significance for saving lives. Natural polysaccharides, as the main chemical component, have been widely used in the preparation of hemostasis due to their perfect biocompatibility and biodegradability. Polysaccharide based hemostatic products are available in variety of forms, such as, hydrogel, sponges, gauze and microspheres. The purpose of the present review is to report the research progress on polysaccharide hemostatic products and technology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据