4.7 Article

Effects of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir therapy on chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 4, infected children of 3-6 years of age

期刊

LIVER INTERNATIONAL
卷 40, 期 2, 页码 319-323

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/liv.14308

关键词

3-6 years; children; chronic HCV; genotype 4; ledipasvir; sofosbuvir

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background & Aims Treatment of children aged 3-6 genotype 4 is still limited by the interferon side effects. We aimed in this study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir in children (3-6 years) genotype 4 chronic HCV-infected patients. Methods In total, 22 consecutive chronic HCV-infected patients (mean age 4.8 +/- 0.9years, 19 males) were included in this prospective study. All patients received sofosbuvir 200 mg/ledipasvir 45 mg in a single oral daily dose. Patients were randomly subdivided into two groups according the duration of treatment into 8 and 12 weeks. All the clinical and laboratory data were collected. All the side effects were recorded from the patients or their parents. Follow-up were made at Week 4, 8 and 12 and 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12). Results The overall SVR12 rate was 100%. At Week 4, 9/11 patients in the 12-week group (81.8%; 95% CI: 52.3%-94.7%) achieved virologic negativity, vs 10/11 (90.9%; 95% CI: 62.3%-98.4%) in the 8-week group. At Week 8, 10/11 (90.8%; 95% CI: 62.3%-98.4%) in the 12-week group vs 11/11 (100%; 95% CI: 74.1%-100%) in the 8-week group were virologically negative. The reported side effects were cough, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea especially early in the treatment. The main complaint was difficulty in swallowing the tablets in the youngest patient at the beginning of the course of treatment. All patients were compliant to treatment. Conclusion Sofosbuvir/ledipasvir combination is safe and tolerable in the chronic infected HCV genotype 4 infected children (3-6 years). The 8-week treatment duration is similarly effective as the 12-week duration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据