4.7 Article

Design and development of high affinity dual anticancer peptide-inhibitors against p53-MDM2/X interaction

期刊

LIFE SCIENCES
卷 245, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.117358

关键词

MDM2; MDMX; Anti-cancer peptide; FoldX; Molecular dynamics simulation

资金

  1. Cancer Control Research Center, Cancer Control Foundation, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran [CCF-97035]
  2. University of Tabriz

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: Inhibition of P53-MDM2/X interaction is known as an effective cancer therapy strategy. In this regard, pDI peptide was introduced previously with the potential of targeting MDM2. In this research, the large-scale peptide mutation screening was used to achieve the best sequence of pDI with the highest affinity for inhibition activity against MDM2/X. Main methods: Three mutant peptides of pDI as dual inhibitor peptides including single mutations of pDIm/4W, pDIm/11M and double mutations of pDldm/4W11M were presented with the high affinities to inhibit both MDM2/X. The selected mutants were then evaluated comprehensively to confirm their ability as potent MDM2/ X inhibitors, using a theoretical simulation approach. Key findings: MD simulations analyses confirmed their dual inhibition potential against both MDM2/X interactions with p53 protein. The developed pDIm and mainly pDldm peptides showed stable conformations over the simulation time with conserved secondary structure and effective interaction with MDM2/X by physical binding such as hydrogen bonding. Besides, umbrella sampling free energy calculation indicated higher binding energy, Delta G(binding), of pDIm-MDM2/X and pDldm-MDM2/X compared to pDI-MDM2/X. Significance: The optimized and improved mutant pDI, pDldm, with more effective Delta G(binding) values of - 30 and - 25 kcal/mol to MDMX and MDM2, respectively, is recommended as a promising anticancer agent and suitable candidate for experimental evaluations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据