4.3 Article

Mrr2 mutations and upregulation are associated with increased fluconazole resistance in Candida albicans isolates from patients with vulvovaginal candidiasis

期刊

LETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
卷 70, 期 2, 页码 95-101

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/lam.13248

关键词

Candida albicans; Cdr1; fluconazole; Mrr2; vulvovaginal candidiasis

资金

  1. Shanxi Province [201701D121171]
  2. Research and Development Key Projects of Shanxi Province [201603D321063]
  3. Health Commission of Shanxi Province [201601050, 2018048]
  4. Science & Technology Innovation Foundation for University in Shanxi Province [20161118]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Candida albicans is an opportunistic fungus, which causes vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC). The aim of this study was to evaluate Mrr2 mutation and its expression levels and Candida drug resistance 1 (Cdr1) in C. albicans associated with fluconazole (FCA) resistance. We identified 80 isolates of C. albicans from 155 vaginal secretions and performed FCA drug sensitivity tests, using M27-A3 micro-broth dilution. We extracted DNA, sequenced Mrr2, and performed reverse transcriptase-quantitative PCR polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) to detect mRNA expression levels of Mrr2 and Cdr1. In total, 40 isolates were sensitive, 10 were dose-dependently sensitive, and 30 were resistant to FCA. Mrr2 mutation occurred in 56 center dot 67% isolates, which was significantly higher than that in the FCA sensitive group (26 center dot 08%, P 0 center dot 05). The mRNA expression level of Cdr1 in the FCA resistant group was significantly higher than that in the sensitive group Cdr1 (0 center dot 42 +/- 0 center dot 294 vs 0 center dot 25 +/- 0 center dot 289, P 0 center dot 05). The odds ratio of FCA-resistant occurrence in C. albicans with Mrr2 mutation and high expression levels was 47 center dot 5 times higher than C. albicans without Mrr2 mutation and low expression levels. The results may provide new insights for improving VVC treatment. Significance and Impact of the Study

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据