4.5 Article

Unilateral versus bilateral botulinum toxin injections in adductor spasmodic dysphonia in a large cohort

期刊

LARYNGOSCOPE
卷 130, 期 11, 页码 2659-2662

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/lary.28457

关键词

Laryngology; neurolaryngology; voice; outcomes; spasmodic dysphonia; botulinum toxin

资金

  1. W. T. Gill Summer Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives/Hypothesis The primary treatment of adductor spasmodic dysphonia is repeated injections of botulinum toxin type A (Botox) into the thyroarytenoid muscles. Dosing can be performed into either one or both thyroarytenoid muscles. The objective of this study was to evaluate the treatment effect and side effect profile across a large number of injections. This study was performed previously in 2002 on 45 patients. Study Design Individual cohort study. Methods This is retrospective study of all patients with adductor spasmodic dysphonia with and without tremor treated by the senior laryngologist at George Washington University. In the current study, 272 patients (214 females and 58 males) were included in the current analysis. Duration of effects and side effects (vocal weakness and liquid dysphagia) were recorded into a database for each patient after each injection. These data were analyzed using chi(2) analysis. Results A total of 4,023 injections (2,708 bilateral and 1,315 unilateral) were evaluated in this study. Optimal effect duration (>= 3 months) was more commonly seen in the bilaterally injected patients (55%) compared to the unilaterally injected patients (47%) (P = .0001). Optimal side effect duration (<= 2 weeks) was better for the unilaterally injected patients (77%) compared to the bilaterally injected patients (73%) (P = .023). Having both optimal effect and side effect in the same injection was more commonly seen in the bilaterally injected patients (36%) compared to the unilaterally injected patients (33%) (P = .0228). Conclusions This study shows that bilateral injections of Botox are more effective in producing optimal effect/side effect profiles. Level of Evidence 2b Laryngoscope, 2019

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据