4.6 Article

Soil loss tolerance in calcareous soils of a semiarid region: evaluation, prediction, and influential parameters

期刊

LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT
卷 31, 期 15, 页码 2156-2167

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ldr.3597

关键词

Dorudzan Dam; erodibility; land degradation; Skidmore method; soil thickness

资金

  1. Iran National Science Foundation
  2. Shiraz University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Predicting soil loss tolerance (T-value) as a first and crucial step in assessing soil erosion using pedotransfer functions (PTFs) could save time and cost. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluateT-value and its influential parameters for calcareous soils of the Dorudzan Watershed, Fars Province, Iran, and to develop PTFs for its prediction using easily measureable soil properties.T-value was determined in 60 soil profiles based on the soil thickness method. Various basic soil properties were used to develop five PTFs using stepwise multiple linear regression.T-value varied from 3.5 to 22.5 with a mean value of 10.4 t ha(-1)yr(-1), which is approximately equal to the proposed value by US Department of Agriculture (11 t ha(-1)yr(-1)).T-value in Inceptisols located in the dam shore and agricultural lands was significantly higher than that of Entisols located in the forest and rangelands. Organic matter (OM) with a correlation coefficient of .77 withT-value was the most influential variable in prediction ofT-value. The PTF 5, which used OM, soil aggregate stability, and permeability, with the highestR(2)(0.72 and 0.79), the lowest mean error (-0.44 and 1.75 t ha(-1)yr(-1)), the lowest root mean square error (2.98 and 2.75 t ha(-1)yr(-1)) and the minimum Akaike information criterion (51.1 and 17.2) provided the best predictions forT-value. However, when considering the acceptable indices and easier measureable soil properties (OM, soil erodibility, and pH) in PTF 3, we concluded that it was the best model to predictT-value. Generally, the application of thickness method is recommended to determineT-value in semiarid regions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据