4.6 Review

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis-Is there a Benefit in Using Neoadjuvant Systemic Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma?

期刊

JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
卷 203, 期 6, 页码 1147-1154

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000746

关键词

drug therapy; combination; meta-analysis; neoadjuvant therapy; penile neoplasms; systematic review

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a recommended treatment for patients with penile cancer with bulky inguinal lymphadenopathy or unresectable primary tumors, although there is no evidence of its benefit from randomized trials. Materials and Methods: We conducted a systematic search in Embase (R) and MEDLINE (R) for studies reporting on patients who received preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced penile squamous cell carcinoma. Objective response rate, pathological complete response, grade 3 or greater toxicity and overall mortality were evaluated in terms of neoadjuvant chemotherapy type, which was dichotomized as nontaxane-platinum and taxane-platinum regimens. Results: Overall 10 studies met the inclusion criteria, enrolling a total of 182 patients, with 66 (36.3%) and 116 (63.7%) treated with nontaxane-platinum and taxane-platinum regimens, respectively. The pooled results demonstrated an objective response rate of 53% (95% CI 42-64), pathological complete response rate of 16%, grade 3 or greater toxicity rate of 40% (95% CI 19-64) and overall mortality of 55% (95% CI 40-70) in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Stratified subanalysis revealed an objective response rate of 55% and 49%, a pathological complete response of 9% and 20%, a toxicity rate of 26% and 49%, and an overall mortality of 54% and 58% for nontaxane-platinum vs taxaneplatinum regimens, respectively. Conclusions: The pooled findings in this study suggest that approximately 50% of the patients with bulky regional lymph node metastases from penile cancer respond to platinum based neoadjuvant chemotherapy and approximately 16% of

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据