4.6 Article

Rate-dependent adhesion of cartilage and its relation to relaxation mechanisms

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103493

关键词

Cartilage; Adhesion; Fluid pressure; Interfacial peeling; Poroviscoelasticity

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CMMI-DCSD-1662456]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cartilage adhesion has been found to play an important role in friction responses in the boundary lubrication regime, but its underlying mechanisms have only been partially understood. This study investigates the rate dependence of adhesion from pre-to post-relaxation timescales of cartilage and its possible relation to relaxation responses of the tissue. Adhesion tests on cartilage were performed to obtain rate-dependent cartilage adhesion from relaxed to unrelaxed states and corresponding relaxation responses. The rate dependence of cartilage adhesion was analyzed based on experimental relaxation responses. Cartilage adhesion increased about 20 times from relaxed to unrelaxed states. This rate-dependent enhancement correlated well with the load relaxation responses in a characteristic time domain. These experimental results indicated that the degree of recovery (or relaxation) in the vicinity of contact during unloading governed the rate dependence of cartilage adhesion. In addition, the experimentally measured enhancement of adhesion was interpreted with the aid of computationally and analytically predicted adhesion trends in viscoelastic, poroviscoelastic, and cohesive contact models. Agreement between the experimental and predicted trends implied that the enhancement of cartilage adhesion originated from complex combinations of interfacial peeling and negative fluid pressure generated within the contact area during unloading. These findings enhance the current understanding of rate-dependent adhesion mechanisms explored within short time scales and thus could provide new insight into friction responses and stick-induced damage in cartilage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据