4.3 Article

Endoscopic management of strictures in patients with Crohn's disease - A multi-center experience in Taiwan

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE FORMOSAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
卷 119, 期 10, 页码 1500-1505

出版社

ELSEVIER TAIWAN
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2019.12.005

关键词

Endoscopy; Stricture; Crohn's disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Purpose: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic gastrointestinal (GI) disorder that causes relapsing inflammation and severe mucosal damage in the intestine. Crohn's disease (CD)-related stricturing complications are a major cause of surgery, disability, and reduced quality of life. Endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) has been shown to reliably delay or prevent surgery in patients with stricturing CD. However, cases of EBD performed for stricture in CD in Taiwan are rare. In this study, we want to evaluate the experiences regarding EBD for stricturing CD in Taiwan. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 9 medical centers in Taiwan. Patients with CD-related strictures who were treated with EBD were included and analyzed. Results: In nine medical centers, a total of 26 CD patients (19 male, 7 female, mean disease duration 75.4 +/- 65.2 months) underwent 42 EBD procedures during the study period. Among the subjects, an 83.3% (35/42) EBD success rate was seen, but 26.9% (7/26) patients underwent surgery after ineffective EBD. In the surgery group, the the small bowel strictures was high compared with the non-surgery group (p = 0.01). There were no significant differences in disease phenotype, disease duration or history of fistulizing disease. In the surgery group, immunosuppressant use was high, and 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) use was low compared with the non-surgery group. After EBD, the physicians tended to change the drugs, especially increasing the use of biologic agents. Conclusion: EBD is a safe and effective procedure for CD-related stricture, with a 83.3% success rate in Taiwan. Copyright (C) 2019, Formosan Medical Association. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据